Irregularity

There are some instances where just plain “bluntness” is needed.  This article is outlining one of those instances.  A bit of a warning….her bluntness may be a bit much for some readers.  I found it an honest, upfront challenge.  The other piece of hypocrisy the Church never admits to is that a priest….”thou art a priest forever”….can far more easily be released from his vows and even then marry than a divorced person can get a marriage anulled if they want to remarry.  It will be interesting to hear from you readers…..reyanna

By Questions from a Ewe                  July 14, 2016                Questions from a Ewe blogspot

Last week Philadelphia’s Archbishop Chaput said remarried divorced Catholics shouldn’t receive Communion unless they abstain from sex…likewise for same sex couples. Furthermore, he said those same people shouldn’t be allowed to serve on parish councils, instruct the faithful, serve as lectors or dispense Communion.  (I think they can still operate heavy machinery and definitely can contribute financially.)  He feels such people are in “irregular” relationships that offer “a serious counter-witness to Catholic belief, which can only produce moral confusion in the community.”

Coincidentally, that same week, a priest confessed to me that he is sexually active.  This places him in the worldwide majority of priests, since according to psychologists who study priests’ sexuality, 50% of U.S. priests and a higher percentage of priests from other global regions are sexually active.   By the way, this priest felt his sexual activity was “sinful” but seemed prepared to suffer this sin repeatedly in the future.

Regardless of one’s opinion about the sinfulness of priests’ sexual relationships, aside from converted married former Anglican priests, any sexual activity Roman Catholic priests have is categorically dishonest and unhealthy because it is secretive.

This guy, like other sexually active priests, which means the majority of priests, not only receives communion, he consecrates the host.   I guess Chaput is ok with sexually active priests receiving and consecrating the host because it’s not “irregular.”  It’s become so regular that it is the majority of priests who have secret, dishonest, unhealthy sexual relationships.

Not only do sexually active priests consecrate and dispense communion, they lead parish councils, instruct the faithful, read the gospel, and preach all while leading an inherently dishonest life.  Archbishop Chaput, pardon me, but THAT is what I find a counter-witness and morally confusing.  I’ll go so far as to say the deception and hypocrisy are morally repugnant.

To continue reading, click HERE.

This entry was posted in In the News. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

  1. Ruth Zemek
    Posted July 15, 2016 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

    The Ewe has nailed it, once again.

    I’d like to add that I believe many priests are forced into this hypcrisy by their natural need to be loved. For many, this love may begin innocently…and then, as is natural, move to intimacy.

    The church leaders who are in denial or who worship the institution (and refuse to let it mature) are the real problem.

    Women priests and bishops will take care of much of this.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*
*

  • Subscribe to our website via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to receive notifications of new posts to our website by email.

    Join 114 other subscribers

  • Subscribe to our Email Newsletter detailing news about ACC

    Enter your Email Address in space below and click “Join” and follow prompts.


  • Newsletter Archives